Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

I am an SFP affiliated Financial Advisor

No. 240 – Weighing up the pros and cons of RAs and tax-free investments

by | Feb 2, 2026 | Financial Planning, Investment, Retirement, Tax

Question

I pay tax at the 45% marginal rate and want to invest R3 000 a month for the next 10 years. Should I use a retirement annuity or a tax-free investment for my savings?  I do not own any tax free or retirement investments.

Answer

Both tax-free investments and retirement annuities have meaningful advantages.  The choice you make depends on what is more important to you – flexibility or tax efficiency.

 

The tax-free investment option

Tax-free investments are appealing because of their simplicity. All the growth is free of tax. Withdrawals are not taxed. There are no access restrictions and no future tax consequences to manage.

 

Unlike retirement investments, tax-free investments are not subject to Regulation 28, which gives you more investment freedom and, potentially, higher long-term returns.

 

The main limitation is the contribution cap. Investors are restricted to R36 000 per year, with a lifetime limit of R500 000.

 

The retirement annuity option

Retirement annuities offer a benefit that no tax-free investment can replicate: the upfront tax deduction.

 

 Contributions to a retirement annuity are deductible up to 27.5% of your taxable income. For an individual paying tax at 45%, this represents a significant immediate saving.

 

Like tax-free investments, retirement annuities grow free of income tax, dividends tax and capital gains tax. However, access to the funds is restricted until you reach the age of 55.

 

At retirement, up to one-third may be taken as a lump sum, subject to the retirement lump-sum tax table, and the remaining two-thirds must be used to purchase an annuity. Income drawn from that annuity is taxable.

 

These restrictions are material and should not be ignored. The question is whether the tax benefit compensates for them. The example below should help quantify the benefit:

 

Example

A contribution of R3 000 per month equals R36 000 per year, or R360 000 over 10 years before growth.  Assume a tax-free investment earns 10% per year due to the absence of Regulation 28 limits, while a retirement annuity earns a more conservative 8% per year.

 

After 10 years, the outcomes are as follows:

Investment

Return

Value after 10 years

Tax-free

10%

R620 000

Retirement annuity

8%

R550 000

 

The impact of the tax saving on the RA

We need to account for the tax saving that you get with the RA premiums.

 

At a marginal tax rate of 45%, contributing R3 000 per month to a retirement annuity generates a tax saving of R1 350 per month, or R16 200 per year. Over 10 years, the cumulative tax saving is R162 000.

 

If these annual tax savings are invested separately into a tax-free investment at a 10% annual return, they grow to approximately R260 000 over the same period.

 

Comparing the outcomes

Option 1: Tax-free investment only
Value after 10 years: approximately R620 000.

 

All proceeds are completely tax free and can be accessed at any time, either as an income stream or through ad hoc lump-sum withdrawals.

 

Option 2: Retirement annuity with tax savings reinvested
Total value after 10 years: approximately R810 000.

 

This consists of a retirement annuity value of around R550 000, of which one-third (R183 333) may be taken as a lump sum at retirement, likely falling within the tax-free portion of the retirement lump-sum table, and two-thirds (R366 667) must be used to purchase an annuity.

 

In addition, the accumulated value of the tax savings invested over the period amounts to approximately R260 000 in a tax-free investment.

 

This results in a total tax-free lump sum of roughly R443 000, with the same flexibility as a tax-free investment, plus an annuity of R366 667. At a 5% drawdown rate, this annuity would provide an income of approximately R18 000 per year, taxed at the marginal rate applicable at the time.

 

Which option produces the better outcome?

At its core, this is a trade-off between tax efficiency and ease of access.  This is summarized below:

Feature

Tax-free investment only

RA with tax savings reinvested

Total contributed

R360 000

R360 000

Assumed return

10%

8% (RA) + 10% (tax saving)

Investment value

± R620 000

± R810 000 (combined)

Tax-free lump sum available

R620 000

± R443 000

Compulsory annuity

None

R366 667

Annual income from annuity

N/A

± R18 000 at 5% drawdown

Tax on withdrawals

None

Lump sum likely tax free; annuity income taxed

Access before retirement

Full access at any time

No access until retirement age of 55

 

 A tax-free investment offers maximum flexibility, while a retirement annuity restricts access in exchange for a powerful upfront tax saving that, when reinvested, can materially improve the long-term outcome for high-income earners.

KENNY MEIRING IS AN INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISER

Contact him via phone, email or via contact phone on the financialwellnesscoach.co.za website

Read more of our articles on the Daily Maverick website or newspaper weekly!

Nov 02 2026

No. 276 – Protecting your family finances while freelancing

Question After I was retrenched, I have started life as a freelancer. I am enjoying the independence, but I am concerned about losing the benefits that I previously...
Nov 02 2026

No. 275 – Money in the bank could cost you more in tax

Question I recently got a shock from my tax advisor and was told I have to pay SARS over R100 000 this year.  My advisor said it was because I have too much money in my...
Nov 02 2026

No. 274 – Weighing up rental income against long-term investment growth

Question I have a rental property worth R5.5 million that generates an income of R46,000 a month. After expenses, I am left with R32,650. As I don't need the income, I...
Nov 02 2026

No. 273 – Three effective ways for passing wealth to grandchildren

Question I have R10 million that I would like to use to provide my grandchildren with an ongoing income. What is the best way to structure this?Answer There are a few...
Oct 05 2026

No. 272 – Plan ahead for business ownership after death

Question My husband owns a business with two partners. If my husband dies what happens to his shares and how do I make sure I receive the value of his share of the...
Oct 05 2026

No. 271 – Planning for living and having money left to leave after your death

Question I am 65 and have a retirement fund worth R5 million. I want an income, but I also want to leave something to my son when I die. What should I do?Answer...
Sep 21 2026

No. 270 – Making sure that where there is a will, there is clarity, not chaos

In South Africa, if you die without a valid will, the law decides who inherits your assets. In other words, everyone has an estate plan – the question is whether it is...
Sep 21 2026

No. 269 – Preserving property while treating children fairly

Question My wife and I are 55 and in good health. We have two adult children, one of whom lives overseas and is unlikely to return. We own a family holiday home worth...
Sep 21 2026

No. 268 – Access bonds can boost emergency savings, but discipline is vital

Question Is it prudent to put your emergency fund into your access bond, where it reduces the interest on your home loan but remains available if you need it?Answer...
Sep 02 2026

No. 267 – The case for giving children an early inheritance

Question My wife and I are in our seventies and have considerably more money than we are likely to spend. Our children are in their forties and could use the money now....

Download the Life File